tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84915272704282719.post6351136198968629480..comments2021-08-03T06:48:41.028-05:00Comments on The Public Money: The Noise Machine (01/04/11)Coryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01939964640082045428noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84915272704282719.post-34912286385531498952011-01-06T21:01:13.772-06:002011-01-06T21:01:13.772-06:00What am I supposed to get?What am I supposed to get?Evanhttp://www.perryvsworld.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84915272704282719.post-448228117448756732011-01-05T20:17:55.383-06:002011-01-05T20:17:55.383-06:00** The Texas Public Policy Foundation as a "p...** The Texas Public Policy Foundation as a "policy group". Which they are, but they should also be categorized as "conservative" (Which they DO classify the CATO institute as later in the article FWIW) **<br /><br />Cato would probably self-identify as small-l libertarian moreso than conservative. Erratic day for Texas Watchdog with those two examples. They usually do better.<br /><br />My thought is that if a journalist is going to take the time to put a label on an organization, then it ought to be done consistently for ALL orgs, and they damn well ought to get it right. Or, simply use how the organization bills itself in such references. Or, don't do it at all.Kevin Whitedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16224281546194611975noreply@blogger.com